Compare
Amazon Titan Text Express vs Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL
This page is context-first: how much text each model can take in one request. Full specs adds capabilities and limits; the pricing matrix below is only about $/million tokens from hosts that list both models.
Context window · side by side
Bar length is relative to the larger of the two windows (100% = max of this pair). This is not pricing.
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL has about 3.1× the context window of the other in this pair.
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL has 212% more context capacity (131K vs 42K tokens).
Quick verdicts
Short takeaways — validate with your own workloads.
Long document processing
Use Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL. Its 131K context fits entire documents without chunking (vs 42K).
Full specs
Context, output, capabilities, and dates. Green highlights the favorable value where we compute a winner.
| Spec | Amazon Titan Text Express | Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 42,000 tokens (42K) | 131,072 tokens (131K) |
| Max output tokens | 8,000 tokens (8K) | N/A |
| Speed tier | Balanced | Fast |
| Vision | No | Yes |
| Function calling | No | No |
| Extended thinking | No | Yes |
| Prompt caching | No | No |
| Batch API | No | No |
| Release date | N/A | Oct 2025 |
Pricing matrix
Dollar rates only: hosts that list both models, per 1M tokens. For how much text fits, use the context section above — not this table.
| Provider | Amazon Titan Text Express in | Amazon Titan Text Express out | Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL in | Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL out |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aws Bedrock | $1.30/M | $1.70/M | — | — |
Frequently asked questions
Powered by Mem0
Use a smaller model.
Get better results.
Mem0 gives your AI long-term memory so you stop re-sending context on every call. That means you can use a smaller, faster, cheaper model — and still get better answers.
Example: a multi-turn chat session
80% less to send — works with any model