Compare
Devstral Small 1.1 vs Trinity Large Thinking (free)
This page is context-first: how much text each model can take in one request. Full specs adds capabilities and limits; the pricing matrix below is only about $/million tokens from hosts that list both models.
Model
Trinity Large Thinking (free)
Context window
262K
262,144 tokens · ~197K words
Context window · side by side
Bar length is relative to the larger of the two windows (100% = max of this pair). This is not pricing.
Trinity Large Thinking (free) has about 2× the context window of the other in this pair.
Trinity Large Thinking (free) has 100% more context capacity (262K vs 131K tokens).
Quick verdicts
Short takeaways — validate with your own workloads.
Long document processing
Use Trinity Large Thinking (free). Its 262K context fits entire documents without chunking (vs 131K).
Full specs
Context, output, capabilities, and dates. Green highlights the favorable value where we compute a winner.
| Spec | Devstral Small 1.1 | Trinity Large Thinking (free) |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 131,072 tokens (131K) | 262,144 tokens (262K) |
| Max output tokens | N/A | 80,000 tokens (80K) |
| Speed tier | Balanced | Deep |
| Vision | No | No |
| Function calling | Yes | Yes |
| Extended thinking | No | Yes |
| Prompt caching | Yes | No |
| Batch API | No | No |
| Release date | Jul 2025 | Apr 2026 |
Frequently asked questions
Powered by Mem0
Use a smaller model.
Get better results.
Mem0 gives your AI long-term memory so you stop re-sending context on every call. That means you can use a smaller, faster, cheaper model — and still get better answers.
Example: a multi-turn chat session
80% less to send — works with any model