Compare

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Trinity Large Thinking (free)

This page is context-first: how much text each model can take in one request. Full specs adds capabilities and limits; the pricing matrix below is only about $/million tokens from hosts that list both models.

Mistral

Model

Mistral Medium 3.5

Image inputTool calling

Context window

262K

262,144 tokens · ~197K words

Model page
Arcee Ai

Model

Trinity Large Thinking (free)

Tool calling

Context window

262K

262,144 tokens · ~197K words

Model page

Context window · side by side

Bar length is relative to the larger of the two windows (100% = max of this pair). This is not pricing.

Mistral Medium 3.5262K
Trinity Large Thinking (free)262K

Same context window size for both models.

Mistral Medium 3.5 and Trinity Large Thinking (free) have identical context windows (262K tokens).

Full specs

Context, output, capabilities, and dates. Green highlights the favorable value where we compute a winner.

SpecMistral Medium 3.5Trinity Large Thinking (free)
Context window262,144 tokens (262K)262,144 tokens (262K)
Max output tokensN/A80,000 tokens (80K)
Speed tierBalancedDeep
VisionYesNo
Function callingYesYes
Extended thinkingYesYes
Prompt cachingNoNo
Batch APINoNo
Release dateApr 2026Apr 2026

Frequently asked questions

Trinity Large Thinking (free) has a larger context window: 262K tokens vs 262K. For long documents, large codebases, or extended agent sessions, the larger context window reduces the need to chunk inputs or summarize history.

Powered by Mem0

Use a smaller model.
Get better results.

Mem0 gives your AI long-term memory so you stop re-sending context on every call. That means you can use a smaller, faster, cheaper model — and still get better answers.

Example: a multi-turn chat session

Without Mem0~128K tokens sent
Full history
Repeated info
Old context
With Mem0~20K tokens sent
Key memories
Current turn

80% less to send — works with any model