Compare
Palmyra X5 vs Qwen2 5 32b
This page is context-first: how much text each model can take in one request. Full specs adds capabilities and limits; the pricing matrix below is only about $/million tokens from hosts that list both models.
Context window · side by side
Bar length is relative to the larger of the two windows (100% = max of this pair). This is not pricing.
Palmyra X5 has about 8.1× the context window of the other in this pair.
Palmyra X5 has 712% more context capacity (1040K vs 128K tokens).
Quick verdicts
Short takeaways — validate with your own workloads.
Long document processing
Use Palmyra X5. Its 1040K context fits entire documents without chunking (vs 128K).
Long output (reports, code files)
Use Qwen2 5 32b. Its 128K max output lets you generate complete artifacts in one request.
Full specs
Context, output, capabilities, and dates. Green highlights the favorable value where we compute a winner.
| Spec | Palmyra X5 | Qwen2 5 32b |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1,040,000 tokens (1040K) | 128,000 tokens (128K) |
| Max output tokens | 8,192 tokens (8K) | 128,000 tokens (128K) |
| Speed tier | Balanced | Balanced |
| Vision | No | No |
| Function calling | No | Yes |
| Extended thinking | No | No |
| Prompt caching | No | No |
| Batch API | No | No |
| Release date | Jan 2026 | N/A |
Pricing matrix
Dollar rates only: hosts that list both models, per 1M tokens. For how much text fits, use the context section above — not this table.
| Provider | Palmyra X5 in | Palmyra X5 out | Qwen2 5 32b in | Qwen2 5 32b out |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nebius | — | — | $0.060/M | $0.200/M |
Frequently asked questions
Powered by Mem0
Use a smaller model.
Get better results.
Mem0 gives your AI long-term memory so you stop re-sending context on every call. That means you can use a smaller, faster, cheaper model — and still get better answers.
Example: a multi-turn chat session
80% less to send — works with any model