Compare
Llama 4 Scout 17b 16e vs Meta Llama3 1 8b Instruct
This page is context-first: how much text each model can take in one request. Full specs adds capabilities and limits; the pricing matrix below is only about $/million tokens from hosts that list both models.
Model
Llama 4 Scout 17b 16e
Context window
10M
10,000,000 tokens · ~7.5M words
Model
Meta Llama3 1 8b Instruct
Context window
128K
128,000 tokens · ~96K words
Context window · side by side
Bar length is relative to the larger of the two windows (100% = max of this pair). This is not pricing.
Llama 4 Scout 17b 16e has about 78.1× the context window of the other in this pair.
Llama 4 Scout 17b 16e has 7712% more context capacity (10000K vs 128K tokens). Llama 4 Scout 17b 16e is 77% cheaper on input.
Quick verdicts
Short takeaways — validate with your own workloads.
Long document processing
Use Llama 4 Scout 17b 16e. Its 10000K context fits entire documents without chunking (vs 128K).
RAG / high-volume retrieval
Use Llama 4 Scout 17b 16e. Input tokens are 77% cheaper — critical when sending large retrieved contexts.
Long output (reports, code files)
Use Llama 4 Scout 17b 16e. Its 16K max output lets you generate complete artifacts in one request.
Full specs
Context, output, capabilities, and dates. Green highlights the favorable value where we compute a winner.
| Spec | Llama 4 Scout 17b 16e | Meta Llama3 1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 10,000,000 tokens (10000K) | 128,000 tokens (128K) |
| Max output tokens | 16,384 tokens (16K) | 2,048 tokens (2K) |
| Speed tier | Fast | Fast |
| Vision | Yes | No |
| Function calling | Yes | Yes |
| Extended thinking | No | No |
| Prompt caching | No | No |
| Batch API | No | No |
| Release date | N/A | N/A |
Pricing matrix
Dollar rates only: hosts that list both models, per 1M tokens. For how much text fits, use the context section above — not this table.
| Provider | Llama 4 Scout 17b 16e in | Llama 4 Scout 17b 16e out | Meta Llama3 1 8b Instruct in | Meta Llama3 1 8b Instruct out |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aws Bedrock | — | — | $0.220/M | $0.220/M |
| Azure | $0.200/M | $0.780/M | — | — |
| Deepinfra | $0.080/M | $0.300/M | — | — |
| Groq | $0.110/M | $0.340/M | — | — |
| Lambda | $0.050/M | $0.100/M | — | — |
| Novita | $0.180/M | $0.590/M | — | — |
| Nscale | $0.090/M | $0.290/M | — | — |
| Sambanova | $0.400/M | $0.700/M | — | — |
| Together Ai | $0.180/M | $0.590/M | — | — |
Frequently asked questions
Powered by Mem0
Use a smaller model.
Get better results.
Mem0 gives your AI long-term memory so you stop re-sending context on every call. That means you can use a smaller, faster, cheaper model — and still get better answers.
Example: a multi-turn chat session
80% less to send — works with any model